The article discusses the evolving interpretation and application of free speech rights in the Indian judicial system, highlighting a shift from protective measures enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution to a more restrictive judicial approach focused on societal norms and sentiments.
Key Points:
Judicial Management of Speech: The article argues that contemporary Indian courts are manipulating free speech rather than protecting it. The essence of Article 19(1)(a) – which protects citizens from tyranny through free expression – is under threat as courts increasingly act as arbiters of what is considered acceptable speech.
Case Study - Criticism of Government: A notable example is a social media post by a 24-year-old who criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi after a ceasefire with Pakistan in May 2025. The Allahabad High Court refused to quash a First Information Report (FIR) against him, stating that “emotions cannot be permitted to overflow,” which indicates a troubling inversion of constitutional values.
Kamal Haasan Controversy: The Karnataka High Court’s response to Kamal Haasan’s remark about Kannada being a “daughter of Tamil” exemplifies this trend. Rather than evaluating whether the statement constituted hate speech, the court advised him to apologize to protect “the sentiments of the masses.”
Increasing Emotional Thresholds: Courts have started equating speech that provokes emotional responses with actionable harm. This misinterpretation of constitutional protections threatens the essence of a democratic society where speech must only be restricted when it incites violence or hatred, not merely when it offends.
Judicial Interventions on Social Media: In the case of producer and podcaster Ranveer Gautam Allahadia, the court’s concerns centered on whether the use of explicit language in a podcast could fall outside constitutional protections. Emphasis is placed on prevailing social norms rather than the actual content or harm done.
Impact on Academic Freedom: Historian Ali Khan Mahmudabad’s legal troubles for criticizing the use of a woman soldier to illustrate military actions against Pakistan reflects how even academic discourse can be scrutinized under the guise of protecting sentiments, thus undermining scholarly criticism.
Pattern of Defamation Cases: The judiciary's stance is also evident in the defamation case involving Rahul Gandhi regarding alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army. Courts have affirmed that speech aimed at state institutions, such as the military, may not be protected under free speech without careful evaluation.
Increasing Litigious Environment: The trend of seeking legal recourse for perceived offense creates a 'market for offence,' wherein the risk of litigation becomes a deterrent against free expression. This has fostered an environment where those who wield outrage are empowered, undermining the foundational principle of free speech.
Chilling Effect on Free Speech: The courts' reluctance to quash FIRs based on subjective interpretations indicates a ‘chilling effect’ on free speech, where the potential for prosecution serves as a deterrent, leading to self-censorship among citizens.
Call for Judicial Reform: The article argues for a return to principles that protect speakers’ rights and individual liberties, urging the courts to focus on safeguarding constitutional rights rather than appeasing wider societal sentiments. Judicial guidance should not mandate apologies but emphasize individual choice in expression.
Conclusion:
The article asserts that as long as vague laws regarding sedition and public order exist and as courts favor restricting expression based on sentiment, the fundamental right to free speech in India remains endangered. It emphasizes the need for a judicial environment that encourages dissent and robust discourse rather than one that stifles free expression through the coercion of decorum and emotional consideration.
Relevant Dates & Legal References:
- May 2025: Operation Sindoor ceasefire event.
- Constitutional Article: Article 19(1)(a) - Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression.
- Legal Precedents: Reference to reduced scrutiny of defamation and sedition laws as applied in social contexts.
Recommendations for Future Practice:
- Judicial Clarity: There is a pressing need for courts to establish clear legal standards regarding speech that balances sentiment with individual rights.
- Empowerment of Free Expression: Courts should protect free expression as a citizen's right, reasserting the foundational democratic ethos of dissent and robust debate in society.

The article discusses the evolving interpretation and application of free speech rights in the Indian judicial system, highlighting a shift from protective measures enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution to a more restrictive judicial approach focused on societal norms and sentiments.
Key Points:
Judicial Management of Speech: The article argues that contemporary Indian courts are manipulating free speech rather than protecting it. The essence of Article 19(1)(a) – which protects citizens from tyranny through free expression – is under threat as courts increasingly act as arbiters of what is considered acceptable speech.
Case Study - Criticism of Government: A notable example is a social media post by a 24-year-old who criticized Prime Minister Narendra Modi after a ceasefire with Pakistan in May 2025. The Allahabad High Court refused to quash a First Information Report (FIR) against him, stating that “emotions cannot be permitted to overflow,” which indicates a troubling inversion of constitutional values.
Kamal Haasan Controversy: The Karnataka High Court’s response to Kamal Haasan’s remark about Kannada being a “daughter of Tamil” exemplifies this trend. Rather than evaluating whether the statement constituted hate speech, the court advised him to apologize to protect “the sentiments of the masses.”
Increasing Emotional Thresholds: Courts have started equating speech that provokes emotional responses with actionable harm. This misinterpretation of constitutional protections threatens the essence of a democratic society where speech must only be restricted when it incites violence or hatred, not merely when it offends.
Judicial Interventions on Social Media: In the case of producer and podcaster Ranveer Gautam Allahadia, the court’s concerns centered on whether the use of explicit language in a podcast could fall outside constitutional protections. Emphasis is placed on prevailing social norms rather than the actual content or harm done.
Impact on Academic Freedom: Historian Ali Khan Mahmudabad’s legal troubles for criticizing the use of a woman soldier to illustrate military actions against Pakistan reflects how even academic discourse can be scrutinized under the guise of protecting sentiments, thus undermining scholarly criticism.
Pattern of Defamation Cases: The judiciary's stance is also evident in the defamation case involving Rahul Gandhi regarding alleged derogatory remarks about the Indian Army. Courts have affirmed that speech aimed at state institutions, such as the military, may not be protected under free speech without careful evaluation.
Increasing Litigious Environment: The trend of seeking legal recourse for perceived offense creates a 'market for offence,' wherein the risk of litigation becomes a deterrent against free expression. This has fostered an environment where those who wield outrage are empowered, undermining the foundational principle of free speech.
Chilling Effect on Free Speech: The courts' reluctance to quash FIRs based on subjective interpretations indicates a ‘chilling effect’ on free speech, where the potential for prosecution serves as a deterrent, leading to self-censorship among citizens.
Call for Judicial Reform: The article argues for a return to principles that protect speakers’ rights and individual liberties, urging the courts to focus on safeguarding constitutional rights rather than appeasing wider societal sentiments. Judicial guidance should not mandate apologies but emphasize individual choice in expression.
Conclusion:
The article asserts that as long as vague laws regarding sedition and public order exist and as courts favor restricting expression based on sentiment, the fundamental right to free speech in India remains endangered. It emphasizes the need for a judicial environment that encourages dissent and robust discourse rather than one that stifles free expression through the coercion of decorum and emotional consideration.
Relevant Dates & Legal References:
- May 2025: Operation Sindoor ceasefire event.
- Constitutional Article: Article 19(1)(a) - Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression.
- Legal Precedents: Reference to reduced scrutiny of defamation and sedition laws as applied in social contexts.
Recommendations for Future Practice:
- Judicial Clarity: There is a pressing need for courts to establish clear legal standards regarding speech that balances sentiment with individual rights.
- Empowerment of Free Expression: Courts should protect free expression as a citizen's right, reasserting the foundational democratic ethos of dissent and robust debate in society.

Strengthening Probation in Juvenile Justice
The recent national consultation on ‘Strengthening Probation in the Juvenile Justice System in India’ highlighted the critical role of probation in the rehabilitation of children involved with the juvenile justice system. Hosted in New Delhi, the event was collaboratively organized by the Resource Cell for Juvenile Justice (RCJJ) from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) and the Department of Social Work at the University of Delhi. It brought together an array of stakeholders from 20 States and one union territory, including juvenile justice board magistrates, social workers, probation officers, government representatives, civil society members, and legal experts.
Key Highlights:
Date and Venue: The consultation took place recently in New Delhi, as a satellite event to the 5th World Congress on Justice with Children.
Keynote Address: Justice Madan B. Lokur, retired Supreme Court Judge and Chairperson of the UN Internal Justice Council, noted the insufficient emphasis on probation within India's juvenile justice framework. He compared India's understaffing—where one probation officer might handle 150-500 juvenile cases—to the Canadian system, where each officer managed only 30-35 probationers.
Importance of Probation: The discussions underscored the need for probation to be recognized as a foundational element in rehabilitating children in conflict with the law. It emphasized enhancing support structures around probation systems, with considerations given to skill development, staffing ratios, and appropriate training for officers.
Involvement of Authorities: Bharat Parashar, Member Secretary of the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), advocated for giving children a second chance rather than re-traumatizing them. His stance reinforces NALSA's commitment to youth rehabilitation through a competent probation system.
Panel Discussions: Over two days, various sessions examined the socio-legal facets of juvenile justice, advocating for strategic improvements in the probation system. The discussions aimed at identifying existing gaps and proposing solutions to strengthen the role of probation in India’s legal framework.
Historical Context: Prof. Bipin Jojo of TISS discussed the historical development of the legal structure of probation in India from the 1950s onwards, highlighting TISS's ongoing commitment to this field.
Collaborative Effort: Prof. Sanjoy Roy from the University of Delhi pointed out the significance of the collaboration between TISS and DU, marking a historic amalgamation of social work education focused on juvenile justice.
Additional Context:
Current Challenges: There are critical gaps in the implementation of the Probation of Offenders Act in India, reflecting a broader neglect of probation systems which are vital for effective juvenile rehabilitation.
Stakeholder Engagement: The event saw involvement from diverse participants, fostering a multidisciplinary approach to juvenile justice, which is necessary for comprehensive reform.
This national consultation signifies a pivotal movement towards recognizing and reforming the probation system within India’s juvenile justice structure, aiming to provide a more humane and effective rehabilitation framework for children in conflict with the law. The outcomes may influence future policies and operational strategies within the sector.
Polity and Governance

Mumbai Train Safety Improvements Proposed
Summary of the Proposed Rail Safety Measures and Urban Transport Challenges in Mumbai
In the aftermath of the tragic train incident in Mumbra on June 9, 2025, which resulted in the loss of four lives and injuries to nearly a dozen passengers, the Indian Railways has proposed significant safety measures to enhance the security and efficiency of Mumbai's suburban train system.
Highlights of the Proposal:
- Automatic Sliding Doors: The proposed introduction of automatic sliding doors with ventilation louvres aims to prevent footboard travel, which has been a contributing factor in numerous accidents.
- Prevention of Accidental Disembarkation: These sliding doors are expected to keep passengers safely inside the train, particularly during unscheduled stops, thereby reducing the risk of accidents with oncoming trains.
- Crowd Management: To manage passenger flow effectively, the railway may implement vestibules connecting train coaches, helping to distribute crowds more evenly.
Current Safety Concerns:
- Safety Issues Due to Overcrowding: The issue of footboard travel has arisen from severe overcrowding in Mumbai's trains, which serve as the most affordable mode of transport for many commuters.
- Historical Context: The overcrowding has been highlighted by past incidents, including the stampede at Elphinstone Road station in 2017, illustrating chronic safety risks on Mumbai's three major railway lines: Central, Harbour, and Western.
Challenges in Urban Transport:
- Underdeveloped Alternatives: While the suburban trains are a crucial part of Mumbai's transport infrastructure, the system itself has seen minimal improvement over the decades despite increased vehicular traffic and urban sprawling.
- Metro Services: Although the Mumbai Metro is expected to somewhat alleviate congestion, it tends to be unaffordable for lower-income groups.
- Bus Services: There is a call for enhancing bus services, particularly across shorter routes, to improve urban mobility.
- Ferry Transport: There is potential for expanding ferry services as a more eco-friendly and economical alternative, given Mumbai's coastal geography.
Reflection on Urbanization and Safety:
- The train tragedy and other incidents, such as stampedes and fire accidents in congested urban areas, underscore the insufficient preparedness of Indian cities to cope with the repercussions of rapid urbanization.
- Urban planners are urged to re-evaluate the city's transport framework, as the reliance on a north-south commuting pattern is becoming increasingly inadequate.
Overall, while immediate measures aim to enhance rail safety, a broader rethink on urban transport is essential in responding to the demands of a rapidly urbanizing society, ensuring safety, accessibility, and efficiency for all citizens.
Important Points:
- Proposal includes automatic sliding doors for suburban trains to reduce accidents and footboard travel.
- Aim to prevent passengers from disembarking at unscheduled stops.
- Overcrowding remains a serious safety issue, linked to past tragedies.
- Urban transport alternatives like buses and ferries need development alongside existing train services.
- Existing Metro services may not be accessible to lower income groups.
- Urban planners must reassess transport strategies in the context of Mumbai's unique geographic and demographic challenges.
- Recent tragedies highlight the urgent need for better preparedness against urbanization-related risks.
Polity and Governance

California National Guard Troops Deployment
The article discusses the deployment of 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles by U.S. President Donald Trump following civil unrest related to immigration enforcement actions. The situation escalated between protesters and federal immigration authorities, particularly in Paramount, California, leading to confrontations marked by violence.
Key Points:
Deployment Announcement: On June 8, 2020, President Trump ordered the activation of 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles due to escalating protests against immigration enforcement.
Political Reactions:
- California Governor Gavin Newsom criticized the federal decision, stating it was unnecessary and aimed at creating a spectacle rather than addressing law enforcement needs.
- Trump referred to Newsom derogatorily as “Newscum” and accused him of incompetence, insisting that protests against actions by the immigration authorities would not be tolerated.
Context of Violence:
- The protests were triggered by federal immigration checks conducted by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which led to the arrests of over 100 individuals within a week, many of whom had criminal charges including assault and drug trafficking.
- The protests involved severe clashes, including protesters throwing rocks at Border Patrol vehicles and law enforcement using tear gas and other riot control measures.
Function of ICE:
- ICE, part of the Department of Homeland Security, has intensified its crackdowns on immigration under the Trump administration, with plans to increase daily deportations significantly.
National Guard's Role:
- The National Guard is a reserve component of the U.S. Armed Forces that can be used for both domestic and foreign missions. Trump's order places the troops under federal command, with the authority to protect federal personnel and properties during the protests.
- Despite the federal command, the deployment of National Guard troops must still be authorized by the respective state’s governor, contributing to the conflict between Trump and Newsom.
Legal Framework:
- The legal justification for the federal control over the National Guard includes scenarios such as invasion, rebellion, or a situation where the President struggles to execute laws using regular forces.
This incident reflects larger national issues concerning immigration policy and the handling of protests in the context of federal-state relations. It underscores tensions within the U.S. political landscape, especially regarding how federal policies are implemented at the state level.
Polity and Governance

Ethnic Insurgency and Political Crisis in Manipur
Summary of Events in Manipur Amidst Ethnic Insurgency
The ongoing ethnic tensions in Manipur, India, are deeply rooted in historical grievances linked to identity politics. The insurgency has resulted in the formation of various militant groups specifically associated with the Meitei and Kuki communities, including the United National Liberation Front, the People’s Liberation Army, the Kuki National Army, and the Zomi Revolutionary Army. Additionally, the National Socialist Council of Nagaland holds significant influence in the northern parts of Manipur.
Triggering of Violence: Ethnic violence in Manipur escalated significantly in May 2023, reverting many militant networks to active status. The failure of both the central and state governments to control this violence has bolstered the power of these militant factions.
Recent Unrest: Protests erupted in Imphal following the arrest of Asem Kanan Singh, the self-styled “army chief” of the Arambai Tenggol (AT), by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Singh and four of his associates were detained for their involvement in a range of criminal activities linked to the ongoing violence in Manipur in 2023.
Profile of Arambai Tenggol: Initially established as a “socio-religious” organization by BJP MP Leishemba Sanajaoba, the AT has evolved into an armed group involved in violence, extortion, and intimidation. The group's noted coercive behavior includes summoning elected Meitei legislators to a meeting at Kangla Fort in January 2024, where instances of assault were reported.
Government Response: Under the leadership of Chief Minister N Biren Singh, the state government has been criticized for its inability or unwillingness to combat the AT and restore law and order. Following Singh’s resignation in February and the consequent imposition of President's Rule by the central government, efforts to stabilize the situation have been initiated, although calls from some MLAs for the restoration of a popularly elected government continue.
Zero Tolerance Policy Requested: It has been suggested that the central government needs to assertively communicate a zero-tolerance stance against unlawful activities by groups like the AT to deter further escalations.
Simultaneous Violence: In tandem with the arrest of Singh, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) detained three Kuki insurgents in relation to an attack on a police post, where two commandos lost their lives in January 2024. This highlights the pervasive threat posed by armed groups on both sides of the ethnic divide.
Implications for Governance: The situation in Manipur reflects the urgent requirement for the state to reclaim its role as a mediator between the Meitei and Kuki communities. Achieving peace and stability necessitates credible political leadership that can cross ethnic boundaries and foster cooperation.
Long-term Strategies Required: The government needs to persuade all communities within Manipur that a peaceful coexistence is possible and that economic growth cannot be compromised due to ethnic conflicts.
In conclusion, the situation in Manipur underscores the fragility of peace and stability in a diverse and multi-ethnic society, necessitating concerted efforts from both state and central authorities to re-establish governance and restore faith among its citizens.
Polity and Governance

Election Credibility Concerns in Maharashtra
Summary of the Article on the Maharashtra Assembly Elections 2024:
In the context of the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections, Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, has raised serious concerns regarding electoral integrity. Specifically, he has highlighted several key issues that warrant scrutiny:
Voter Discrepancies: There has been an abnormal increase in the number of voters added to the electoral rolls between the general elections and the Assembly elections. Notably, over 39 lakh new voters were registered within six months following the general elections, a trend seen previously in 2014.
Turnout Concerns: There are allegations of unusually high voter turnout figures recorded after 5 p.m. on election day. However, analysis by the Election Commission of India (ECI) suggests that these claims may not hold up, as data indicates no significant spike in turnout during those hours. Provisional voting figures, shared via an app by the ECI, are subject to inaccuracies due to manual data entry, thus raising questions about their reliability.
CCTV Footage Access: The Indian government amended the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 to limit access to CCTV footage from polling stations, which has drawn criticism. Rahul Gandhi has called for better transparency in the electoral process, particularly regarding the retention and availability of this footage for the scrutiny of political parties and their nominees.
Appointment of Election Commissioners: There are concerns regarding the process for appointing Election Commissioners, with specific reference to the Union government's non-compliance with a Supreme Court ruling from 2023. This ruling recommended that the Chief Justice of India should be part of the selection panel for appointing Election Commissioners, which has not been implemented.
Political Parties’ Responsibilities: Political parties, including the BJP and the Congress, have previously expressed concerns about EVMs and electoral processes. However, the article suggests that the burden also lies with these parties to proactively engage in the electoral roll verification process rather than solely contest results after elections conclude.
Call for Transparency: The ECI is urged to improve the transparency of the electoral process by providing machine-readable electoral roll data, thereby allowing for public verification. Furthermore, the updating of electoral rolls should be made more open, ensuring involvement from political parties to enhance scrutiny and public trust in the electoral framework.
Implications for Democracy: The ongoing developments raise fundamental questions regarding the integrity of the electoral process in India, reflecting broader concerns about electoral democracy and governance.
Overall, the article underscores the necessity for the ECI to make concerted efforts toward transparency and accountability in the Indian electoral landscape, particularly in light of the concerns raised by prominent political figures such as Rahul Gandhi.
Key Points:
- Rahul Gandhi raises concerns about the Maharashtra Assembly elections relating to voter discrepancies and turnout.
- Significant voter increases (over 39 lakh) noted post-general elections.
- Allegations of abnormal turnout after 5 p.m. addressed; ECI indicates data inaccuracies.
- Recent amendments restrict access to CCTV footage, prompting calls for transparency.
- Supreme Court ruling on Election Commissioners' appointment not followed by the Union government.
- Political parties urged to engage in the verification process of electoral rolls.
- Emphasis on ECI's responsibility to enhance electoral transparency and accountability.
Polity and Governance

Kerala Seeks Wildlife Act Amendment
Kerala has formally requested the Union Government to amend the Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972, in order to allow the killing of certain wild animals that pose threats to human life and property. The amendment seeks to ease current legal constraints surrounding wildlife conflicts, which have become a significant issue in the state, prompting the government to identify 273 out of 941 village local bodies as hotspots for such incidents.
Summary:
Human-Wildlife Conflict: Wildlife attacks in Kerala have resulted in 919 fatalities and over 8,967 injuries from 2016-17 to 2024-25 (up to January 31). The primary animals involved include tigers, leopards, elephants, bison, wild boars, bonnet macaques, and peafowl.
Causes of Increased Conflict:
- Fluctuations in wildlife populations.
- Habitat degradation driven by various factors.
- Grazing of domestic animals within forest areas.
- Changes in agricultural practices.
- A burgeoning population of wild pigs and monkeys.
Legal Constraints: The current legal structure limits effective and timely action against wildlife threats, particularly for animals under Schedule I of the Wildlife Act. The requirement for the state chief wildlife warden to exhaust all options of tranquilization or relocation before considering lethal measures has been criticized for being inefficient and impractical.
Government's Position: Kerala's State Forest Minister, A K Saseendran, conveyed that the state is not advocating for unrestricted wildlife killings. Instead, the proposal allows for targeted culling of “man-eating” animals under certain conditions, which could include region-specific and seasonal measures. Existing frameworks for crop damage, such as the wild boar control system, are deemed ineffective, as overly stringent guidelines inhibit swift responses to wildlife threats.
Proposed Amendments:
- The government aims to classify wild boars as vermin under section 62 of the Wildlife Act to legislate a temporary culling period.
- It seeks to reclassify bonnet macaques by removing them from Schedule I, thus reinstating the autonomy for the chief wildlife warden to manage aggressive monkey populations without prior court intervention.
Important Points:
- Wildlife Protection Act, 1972: Essential legal framework affecting wildlife management in India.
- Human-Centered Safety: Emphasis on balancing wildlife conservation with the safety of human populations amid rising wildlife conflicts.
- Regional Specificity: The proposed measures to amend the legal framework would likely enhance localized management of wildlife threats.
- Legislative Challenges: Need for legal reforms reflects ongoing tensions between human agricultural interests and wildlife conservation mandates.
In conclusion, the Kerala government’s request for amendments to the Wildlife (Protection) Act demonstrates the need for a balance between conserving wildlife and safeguarding human livelihoods, particularly in regions experiencing significant wildlife-related challenges.
Polity and Governance

Kerala High Court Recognizes Transgender Parents
The Kerala High Court has made a significant judgment recognizing a transgender couple from Kozhikode as legal parents of their biological child. This decision emphasizes the importance of dignity and equality, allowing the couple to be acknowledged as co-parents without relying on gender-binary classifications in official documents. The ruling comes amidst ongoing discussions around LGBTQIA+ rights in India, following previous significant judgments by the Supreme Court.
Key Points from the Judgment:
- Court's Decision: The Kerala High Court directed the issuance of a birth certificate using gender-neutral terminology, avoiding traditional labels of "father" and "mother".
- Legal Context: The Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 was upheld, but the judgment indicates that exceptional cases should allow for the flexibility of the law to embrace diversity.
- Social Justice: The court emphasized that "social justice adjudication" should prioritize over an "adversarial approach" in specific circumstances, broadening the definitions of family, gender, and parenthood.
- Previous Milestones: The decision builds upon earlier rulings such as the NALSA verdict of 2014, which recognized the rights of transgender individuals, and the 2018 Navtej Johar case, which decriminalized same-sex relationships.
The remarks of Justices D Y Chandrachud and A S Bopanna in a prior case highlighted that "atypical" families deserve legal protections and benefits — indicating a progressive trend in judicial thinking regarding family structures in India.
Following the Kerala High Court's ruling, the Madras High Court also upheld the right of a woman to “find a family” in response to a habeas corpus petition wherein a woman was forcibly separated from her lesbian partner. The court referred to the concept of a "chosen family" as being recognized and valid within LGBTQIA+ legal discourse, providing another layer of affirmation for diverse family arrangements.
These judicial affirmations of diversity and acceptance signify a growing sensitivity towards the complexities of family and identity in contemporary India. They bolster rights that extend beyond the conventional definitions, indicating a shift towards an inclusive understanding of familial bonds that transcends traditional norms.
In conclusion, while the recent rulings by the Supreme Court have posed challenges in extending comprehensive civil rights to LGBTQIA+ couples, the Kerala and Madras High Courts have laid a foundational legal framework that affirms queer parenthood and chosen families. This reflects a commitment to ensuring constitutional dignity and social justice in a nation where entrenched social prejudices endure.
Important Bullet Points:
- The Kerala High Court recognized the transgender couple as legal parents of their biological child.
- Emphasis on issuing a gender-neutral birth certificate instead of traditional parent labels.
- The court foregrounded social justice adjudication over adversarial legal approaches.
- Builds upon previous milestones, including the 2014 NALSA verdict and the 2018 Navtej Johar ruling.
- The Madras High Court’s ruling reaffirmed the right to "find a family" within LGBTQIA+ jurisprudence.
- These judicial decisions reflect increasing recognition of diverse family structures and LGBTQIA+ rights in India.
Polity and Governance

Struggling School in Vellambakkam
Summary of the Article on Vellambakkam Panchayat Union Primary School
The article highlights the significant challenges faced by the Vellambakkam Panchayat Union Primary School located in a village in Tiruvallur district, Tamil Nadu, which is experiencing a drastic decline in student enrollment. The school enrollment has dwindled from 13 students two years ago to just three this year, primarily due to a combination of population decline, economic migration, and parental preference for private schooling.
Key Details:
- Enrollment Trends: The school had only one student last year, which increased to three this academic year after efforts by the teacher and community members to promote the school.
- Recent School Reopening: The school reopened on June 2 this year, with only two new students joining after the initial day, highlighting the challenges in attracting students.
- Community Initiative: Local residents have undertaken canvassing and pamphlet distribution to encourage parents to enroll their children, emphasizing the struggle to retain schooling in the community due to dwindling population and economic circumstances.
- Demographics and Infrastructure: The village's population has decreased significantly; as per the 2011 Census, the village had a mere 297 residents, and it is reported that only 35-40 houses remain occupied today, as many residents leave for better job opportunities elsewhere.
- Educational Infrastructure: The nearest private school is situated 1.5 km away and offers transport, appealing to parents seeking safety and convenience, while the nearest government secondary school is 7 km away, which diminishes the appeal for longer-distance schooling.
- Comparative Enrollment Data: According to the UDISE+ 2023-24 report, 64% of government schools in Tamil Nadu have low enrollment figures. Over 3,481 primary schools in the state have fewer than 15 students, showing a systemic issue within the public education sector.
- Government Initiatives: The Union Ministry of Education has called for improvements regarding student enrollment in government schools through the Samagra Shiksha Fund, providing impetus for state educational reforms.
Notable Quotes and Perspectives:
- Teacher's Efforts: The temporary teacher in charge emphasized collective efforts from the community and school management to attract students back to public schooling.
- Community Sentiment: Residents expressed nostalgia about their own schooling experiences, acknowledging the educational groundwork laid by the primary school, yet struggle to persuade current parents due to their preference for private institutions.
- Future of the School: There are concerns regarding the school's viability; educational officials mentioned that if enrollment does not improve, the school might face closure or merger.
Broader Context:
The situation at Vellambakkam reflects a larger trend in rural areas of India where government schools grapple with low enrollment rates due to proximity, transport availability, and the lure of private schooling. Despite significant government efforts, many schools continue to experience low student numbers, raising concerns over educational accessibility and quality in rural India.
Key Points:
- Vellambakkam Primary School's enrollment has plummeted with only three students.
- Community efforts are in place to engage parents and encourage school enrollment.
- Economic migration has led to a decline in the village's population.
- The presence of private schools is influencing parents' choices significantly.
- Government educational programs are focusing on improving enrollment in public schools.
- The future of the school remains uncertain if enrollment does not improve.
This encapsulation reflects the challenges and community dynamics faced by Vellambakkam's primary education system while addressing broader educational issues in rural India.
Polity and Governance